Aspek Pemikiran Dan Metodologi Penyampaian Al-Marbawi Dan Mustafa Abdul Rahman: Perbandingan Dalam Pentafsiran Surah Yasin

[Thoughts and Presentation Methodology of al-Marbawi and Mustafa Abdul Rahman: A Comparison in The Interpretation of Surah Yaseen]

Abstract

The Quranic exegesis in Malaysia has always been strongly influenced by Malay religious teachers from various educational institutions and each of them is subscribing to their preferred method of interpretation. The achievement of previous Muslim scholars can be witnessed from the publication of a large number of books on exegesis. This paper analysed the comparison of thoughts and methodology of presentation of Muhammad Idris Al-Marbawi and Mustafa Abdul Rahman found in their works. The focus of study was on the exegesis of surah Yaseen by both scholars. Through text analysis, both aspects were scrutinised and compared in their work. Results found that the ideas of Al-Marbawi were universal and integral in character; his exegesis was full of discussion that covered wide range of aspects and knowledge. Mustafa Abdul Rahman’s ideas were contradicting Al-Marbawi's; his exegesis was fundamental in nature and he covered the basic knowledge on the verses. From presentation methodology, Al-Marbawi's was organised in unique approach and systematic arrangement, while Mustafa Abdul Rahman’s resorted to easy-to-understand language and discussion approach common to readers.

Abstrak

Perkembangan bidang tafsir di Malaysia diperangaruhi oleh tokoh ulama Melayu daripada pelbagai institusi pendidikan dan setiap daripada mereka mempunyai metode pengajian tafsir yang tersendiri. Keunggulan ilmu tokoh ulama terdahulu dapat dilihat melalui penghasilan kitab-kitab tafsir. Kajian ini bertujuan menganalisis perbandingan aspek pemikiran dan metode penyampaian Muhammad Idris Al-Marbawi dan Mustafa Abdul Rahman dalam karya masing-masing. Fokus kajian ini adalah kepada tafsiran surah Yasin kedua-dua tokoh. Melalui pendekatan kajian perpustakaan, penulis berusaha meneliti dua aspek tersebut dalam karya setiap tokoh dan kemudian membanding antara keduanya. Hasil kajian mendapati pemikiran Al-Marbawi bersifat universal dan integral; pentafsiran beliau sarat dengan perbincangan merangkumi dan merentasi pelbagai bidang ilmu dan aspek. Pemikiran Mustafa Abdul Rahman pula lebih bersifat kontradik dengan Al-Marbawi; pentafsiran beliau mendasar dan merangkumi pengetahuan umum berkenaan ayat. Dari segi metodologi penyampaian Al-Marbawi diwarnai dengan pelbagai pendekatan unik dan susun atur kitab yang sistematik, sementara Mustafa Abdul Rahman menggunakan pendekatan syarahan dengan gaya bahasa yang mudah difahami pembaca.