Psikologi Keselamatan Dalam Analisa Kes Ingkar Arahan Kawalan Pergerakan Melalui Kerangka Maqasid Syariah
[Security Psychology in Analysis of Movement Control Order Breach Cases through Maqasid Syariah Framework]
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33102/uij.vol33no3.438Keywords:
keselamatan, kesihatan, perintah kawalan pergerakanAbstract
Security psychology is a new field that combines psychology and security. It is a feeling out of cognitive and behavioral processes from the reality of security. The world health crisis with Covid 19 has brought the narrative of security psychology viewed constructively. The attitude and level of awareness towards Covid 19 become a measure and a question in combating the threat that this epidemic has. This article discusses the importance of security psychology as a key factor in epidemic containment. Then the analysis of breach PKP instructions as an indicator of the level of security psychology awareness is presented. Data is through case observations from 23 March to 8 June 2020. The description through the framework of Maqasid Syariah is argued. Studies have found that society's indifference to the health of other individuals is a major factor in cases of disobedience. The low level of awareness is the biggest obstacle in the containment of this epidemic. Proposed policy improvements are discussed in this article.
Abstrak
Psikologi keselamatan adalah bidang baharu yang menggabungkan psikologi dan keselamatan. Ia adalah perasaan daripada proses kognitif dan perlakuan daripada realiti keselamatan. Krisis kesihatan dunia dengan Covid 19 telah membawa naratif psikologi keselamatan dilihat secara konstruktif. Sikap dan tahap kesedaran terhadap Covid 19 menjadi ukuran dan persoalan dalam memerangi ancaman bahawa wabak ini. Artikel ini membincangkan kepentingan psikologi keselamatan yang menjadi faktor utama pembendungan wabak. Kemudian analisa kes ingkar arahan PKP sebagai indikator tahap kesedaran psikologi keselamatan dikemukakan. Data adalah melalui cerapan kes daripada 23 Mac hingga 8 Jun 2020. Huraian melalui kerangka Maqasid Syariah dihujahkan. Kajian mendapati sikap tidak ambil peduli masyarakat terhadap kesihatan individu lain merupakan faktor utama berlaku kes ingkar arahan. Tahap kesedaran yang rendah merupakan halangan terbesar dalam pembendungan wabak ini. Cadangan penambahbaikan polisi dibincangkan dalam artikel ini.
Downloads
References
Alias, M. N., Samsudin, M. A., Lubis, M. A., Kamis, M. S., Omar, A. F., & Mokhtar, A. I. (2018). Maqasid Syariah Sebagai Sandaran Hukum Menurut Mazhab. ASEAN Comparative Education Research Journal on Islam and Civilisation (ACER-J), 2(1), 48–58.
Al-Tahitah, A. N., Al-Sharafi, M. A., & Abdulrab, M. (2021). How COVID-19 Pandemic Is Accelerating the Transformation of Higher Education Institutes: A Health Belief Model View. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 348, 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67716-9_21
Aleksandra, D. (2017). Operational Psychology – The Last Range of Military Psychology: Science and Application. 40th Years of Faculty Security Conference, 68–73.
Ban, H.-J., & Kim, H.-S. (2020). Applying the Modified Health Belief Model (HBM) to Korean Medical Tourism. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(10), 3646. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103646
Browne, M., Thomson, P., Rockloff, M. J., & Pennycook, G. (2015). Going against the Herd: Psychological and Cultural Factors Underlying the ‘Vaccination Confidence Gap.’ PLOS ONE, 10(9), e0132562. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0132562
Butcher, F. (2019). Role of research psychology in defence and security. Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps, 165(2), 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1136/jramc-2018-001045
Costa, M. F. (2020). Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants. Revista de Saude Publica, 54. https://doi.org/10.11606/S1518-8787.2020054002494
D’Addario, F. J. (2013). The Psychology of Security. Influencing Global Risk Mitigation, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-417233-3.00001-2
Fiske, S. T. (2005). Social Cognition and the Normality of Prejudgment. In J. F. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L. A. Rudman (Eds.), On the Nature of Prejudice (pp. 36–53). Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing.
Hodkinson, P., Biesta, G., & James, D. (2008). Understanding Learning Culturally: Overcoming the Dualism Between Social and Individual Views of Learning. Vocations and Learning, 1(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-007-9001-y
Jalil, A. (2006). The Significances of Maslahah Concept and Doctrine of Maqasid ( Objectives ) Al- Shari ’ Ah in Project Evaluation. The Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research, 3(1), 171–202.
Kabay, M. E., Robertson, B., Akella, M., & Lang, D. T. (2015). Using Social Psychology to Implement Security Policies. In Computer Security Handbook. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118820650.ch50
Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia. (2021). Home | COVID-19 MALAYSIA. Retrieved March 16, 2020, from http://covid-19.moh.gov.my/
Kuhlmann, S., Stegmaier, P., & Konrad, K. (2019). The tentative governance of emerging science and technology—A conceptual introduction. Research Policy, 48(5), 1091–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.006
Lawson, E. (2020). Herd Thinking. British Journal of General Practice, 70(699), 476–476. https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP20X712661
MF, W., G, B., M, D., WJ, H., & R, P.-C. (2020). COVID-19 Interconnectedness: Health Inequity, the Climate Crisis, and Collective Trauma. Family Process, 59(3).
Mohd Azmir Mohd Nizah, ., Afi Roshezry Abu Bakar, ., & Wirawahida Kamarul Zaman, . (2020a). Analisa Kes Ingkar Arahan Perintah Kawalan Pergerakan Fasa 1 - Fasa 5 Semasa Pandemik Covid-19. Jurnal Psikologi Keselamatan, 2, 83–92.
Mohd Azmir Mohd Nizah, ., Afi Roshezry Abu Bakar, ., & Wirawahida Kamarul Zaman, . (2020b). Analisa Psikologi Keselamatan Terhadap Kes Ingkar Arahan Perintah Kawalan Pergerakan Fasa 1- Fasa 5 Melalui Kerangka Maqasid Syariah. 3rd International Seminar on Islam and Science 2020, 85–98. Nilai: USIM Press.
Paryadi. (2021). Maqashid Syariah: Definisi dan Pendapat Para Ulama. Cross-Border, 4(2), 201–216.
Pramesi, N. A., & Nazarudin. (2020). Implementasi Maqashid Syari’ah dalam Menghadapi Wabah Covid 19. Medina-Te: Jurnal Studi Islam, 16(1), 1–8.
Sardar, Z., Serra, J., & Jordan, S. (2019). Muslim Societies in Postnormal Times. United Kingdom: International Institute of islamic Thought.
Schneier, B. (2008). The Psychology of Security. In The Psychology of Security. In: Vaudenay S. (eds) Progress in Cryptology – AFRICACRYPT 2008.: Vol. 5023 LNCS (pp. 50–79). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68164-9_5
Sulaeman, M. (2021). Maqasid Al-Shariah: Cara Islam Menghadapi Pandemi Covid 19. Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman, 32(2), 263–282.
Taylor, D., Bury, M., Campling, N., Carter, S., Garfield, S., Newbould, J., & Rennie, T. (2006). A Review of the use of the Health Belief Model ( HBM ), the Theory of Reasoned Action ( TRA ), the Theory of Planned Behaviour ( TPB ) and the Trans-Theoretical Model ( TTM ) to study and predict health related behaviour change. In National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
Tong, K. K., Chen, J. H., Yu, E. W. yat, & Wu, A. M. S. (2020). Adherence to COVID-19 Precautionary Measures: Applying the Health Belief Model and Generalised Social Beliefs to a Probability Community Sample. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12230
Von Hippel, W. (2017). Evolutionary psychology and global security. Science and Global Security, 25(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/08929882.2017.1273668
Wahbah al-Zuhaili, . (1994). Fiqh dan Perundangan Islam. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
West, R. (2008). The Psychology of Security. Communications of the ACM, 51(4), 34–41.
World Health Organization. (2021). Tracking SARS-CoV-2 variants. Retrieved August 5, 2021, from https://www.who.int/en/activities/tracking-SARS-CoV-2-variants/
Zotova, O. Y. (2011). Need for Safety in Different Social and Economic Groups. Psychology in Russia: State of Art, 4, 335–347. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2011.0022
Zotova, O. Y., & Karapetyan, L. V. (2018). Psychological security as the foundation of personal psychological wellbeing (analytical review). Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 11(2), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2018.0208
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Mohd Azmir Mohd Nizah, Afi Roshezry Abu Bakar, Wirawahida Kamarul Zaman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
If the article is accepted for publication, the copyright of this article will be vested to author(s) and granted the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, unless otherwise stated. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
