Efikasi Kendiri Guru Pendidikan Islam Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Malaysia: [Differences of Islamic Education Teachers Quality at Secondary School Based on Selected Demographic Factors]

Noornajihan Jaafar

doi:10.33102/uij.vol15no.229

Authors

Noornajihan Jaafar Faculty of Quranic and Sunnah Studies, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33102/uij.vol15no.229

Keywords:

Self Efficacy, Teachers of Islamic Studies, Murabbi

Abstract

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk meninjau tahap efikasi kendiri (EK) guru Pendidikan Islam (GPI) sekolah menengah kebangsaan di Semenanjung Malaysia. Kajian perbezaan berdasarkan beberapa faktor demografi terpilih seperti jantina dan lokasi sekolah turut dijalankan. Kajian korelasi juga dijalankan bagi menilai hubungan antara EK GPI dengan tempoh pengalaman mengajar. Kajian ini adalah berbentuk tinjauan yang menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dan soal selidik merupakan instrumen utama kajian. Teknik pensampelan kelompok atas kelompok digunakan bagi menentukan sampel kajian. Saiz sampel yang terlibat dalam kajian ini adalah seramai 544 orang GPI yang mewakili populasi seramai 8562 orang GPI di SMK semenanjung Malaysia. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan EK GPI berada pada tahap sangat tinggi (min=4.32). Analisis ANOVA dua hala pula menunjukkan tiadanya perbezaan EK GPI terhadap faktor persekitaran berdasarkan jantina. Analisis Pearson pula menunjukkan terdapatnya korelasi yang lemah dan positif antara tempoh pengalaman mengajar dengan EK (r=0.098). Kajian ini dilihat memberi implikasi kepada polisi dan amalan pengajaran GPI.
This study was designed to examine self-efficacy (SE) teachers of Islamic Studies (TIS) in national secondary schools in Peninsular Malaysia. A research on the differences of SE based on a number of demographic factors was also carried out. The study also aimed to assess the relationship between teaching experiences with SE. This study used a quantitative approach and the questionnaire was the main instrument. Multi stage cluster sampling technique was used to determine the sample. The sample size involved in this research were 544 TIS representing a population of 8562 TIS national secondary school in Peninsular Malaysia. The results showed that SE of TIS were very high (min=4.32). Two Ways ANOVA analysis showed there was no difference in the SE of TIS based on gender and school location. Pearson analysis showed that there were weak and positive correlations between teaching experience with SE (r=0.098). In addition, this study has also seen to have implications for the policy and practice of teaching among TIS.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ab. Halim Tamuri. (2011). Penghayatan Islam Melalui Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Paper presented at the Kertas kerja Kongres Pendidikan Islam Kebangsaan.

Abdullah Md. Din. (2011). Pendidikan Islam Malaysia: Isu dan Cabaran. Paper presented at the Kertas kerja Kongres Pendidikan Islam Kebangsaan 2011.

Al-Ghazali Abu Hamid. (t.th). Ihya' Ulum al-Din. Kaherah: al-Masyad.

Alias Baba. (1996). Statistik Penyelidikan dan Pendidikan Dalam Sains Sosial. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Ashton, P. (1984). Teacher Efficacy: A Motivatioanal Paradigm For Effective Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5), 28-32.

Azizi Yahaya, Shahrin Hashim, Jamaludin Ramli, Yusof Boon, & Abdul Rahim Hamdan. (2006). Menguasai Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Professional Publishing Sdn. Bhd.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self Efficacy in Changing Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Berliner, D. C. (2005). The Inner Imposibility of Testing for Teacher Quality. Journal of Teacher Education, 56, 205-213.

Brewster, C., & Fager, J. (2000). Increasing Student Engagement and Motivation: From Time-on-Task to Homework. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.

Casey, M. (2011). Perceived Efficacy and Preparedness of Beginning Teachers to Differentiate Instruction. Johnson & Wales University, UK.

Coady, M., Harper, C., & De Jong, E. (2011). From Preservice to Practice: Mainstream Elementary Teacher Beliefs of Preparation and Efficacy with English Language Learners in the State of Florida. Bilingual Research Journal, 34(2), 223-239.

Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Edisi Ke-2 ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Coladarci, T. (1992). Teacher’s Sense of Efficacy and Commitment to Teaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(4), 323-337.

Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. New Jersey: Pearson Education Ins.

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approach (Ed. Ke-3 ed.) New Jersey: Pearson Education Ins.

Donna, T. (2007). A Contectual Measure of Teacher Efficacy for Teaching Primary School Students Wh Have ESL., Wueensland University of Technology, Quensland.

Egger, K. J. (2006). An Exploration of the Relationships Among Teacher Efficacy, Collective Teacher Efficacy and Teacher Demographic Characteristic in Conservative Christian Schools. University of North Teaxas., Texas.

Gibson, S., & Dembo, M.H. (1984). Teacher Eficacy: A Construct Validatio. Jurnal of Education Psyhology, 76(4), 569-582.

Guilford, J. P., & Fructer, B. (1984). Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education (Ed. Ke-6 ed.). Tokyo: McGraw Hill Kogakusha Ltd.

Guskey, T.R. (1987). Context Variables That Affect Measures of Teacher Efficacy. Journal of Education Research, 811(4), 41-52.

Hassan Langgulung. (1986). Pengenalan Tamadun Islam dam Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Hassan Langgulung. (1987). Penghayatan Nilai-Nilai Islam di Tinjau dari Proses Pembalajaran Dalam Konteks Pendidikan Masa Kini. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 2(5), 13-30.

Henson, R. K., Bennett, D. T., Sienty, S. F., & Chambers, S. M. (2000). The Relationship Between Means-end Task Analysis and Context Specific and Global Efficacy in Emergency Certification Teachers: Exploring a New Model of Efficacy. Paper presented at the Kertas Kerja Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association.

Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1993). Teacher’s Sense of Efficacy and the Organizational Health of School. The Elementary of School Journal 93(4), 353-372.

Imants, J. G., & De Brabander, C. J.(1996). Teachers’ and Principals’ Sense of Efficacy in Elementary Schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(2), 179-195.

Ishak Sin. (2001). Pengaruh Kepimpinan Pengajaran, Kepimpinan Transformasi dan Gantian Kepada Kepimpinan Ke Atas Komitmen Terhadap Organisasi, Efikasi dan Kepuasan Kerja Guru. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.

Khalid Johari, Zurida Ismail, Shuki Osman, & Ahmad Tajuddin Othman. (2009). Pengaruh Jenis Latihan Guru dan Pengalaman Mengajar Terhadap Efikasi Guru Sekolah Menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia,34, 3-14.

Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2011). The Occupational Commitment and Intention to Quit of Practicing and pre-service teachers: Influence of self-efficacy, job stress, and teaching context. Contemporary Educational Psychology.

Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2013). Panduan Keurusetiaan Pengurusan Prestasi di Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.

Kurz, T. B., & Knight, S. L. (2004). An Exploration of the Relationship Among Teacher Efficacy, Collective Teacher Efficacy, and Goal Consensus. Learning Environments Research, 7(2), 111-128.

Mak Moon Song. (2009). Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Perak: Multimedia Sdn. Bhd.

Mohd Hasani Dani, & Shuki Osman (Eds.), Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran: Teori dan Praktis (pp. 161- 188). Kuala Lumpur: McGraw Hill.

Mohd Kamal Hassan. (2011). Pendidikan Yang Membentuk Syakhsiah Bangsa dan Proses Islamisasi. Paper Presented at The Kertas Kerja Kongres Pendidikan Islam Kebangsaan 2011.

Neuman, W. L. (2002). Social Research Methods: Quantitative and Quantitative Approaches (Ed. Ke-5 ed.). Needham Height, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS Survical Manual. Australia: Allyn & Unwin.

Pas, E. T., Bradshaw, C. P., & Hershfeldt, P. A. (2011). Teacher and School Level Predictors of Teachers Efficacy and Burnout: Identifying Potential Areas For Support. Journal of School Psychology.

Polis Diraja Malaysia. (2011). Perangkaan Penglibatan dan Tangkapan Murid Dalam Jenayah Dari Tahun 2007-2011.

Rahmah Murshidi, Mohd Majid Konting, Habibah Elias, & Foo Say Fooi. (2006). Sense of Efficacy Among Beginning Teachers in Sarawak.

Teaching Education, 17(3), 265-275.

Rich, Y., Lev, S., & Fischer, S. (1996). Extending The Concept and Assesment of Teacher’s Efficacy. Educational and Psychological Measurement 56(6), 1015-1025.

Rorlinda Yusof. (2009). Kecerdasan Emosi, Efikasi Kendiri dan Sumbangan Terhadap Komitmen Guru Kaunseling Sekolah Menengah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.

Ross, J. A. (1995). Strategies for Enhancing Teacher’s Belief in Their Effectiveness; Research on a School Improvement Hypothesis. Teacher College Record, 97 (2), 227-251.

Saaidah Abdul Rahman. (2005). Pengaruh Iklim Sosial dan Iklim Tugasan Terhadap Sikap kerja Guru-Guru, Pencapaian Pelajar dan Keberkesanan Sekolah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.

Saklofske, D. H., Michayluk, J. O., Rondhawa, B. S. (1988). Teacher’s Efficacy and Teacher Behaviours. Psychological Reports, 63 (2), 407-414.

Shambaugh, R. W. (2008). Teacher Self Efficacy, Collective Teacher Efficacy, Automatic Thoughts, State of Mind and Stress In Elementary School Teacher. Philadelphia College of Osteoptic Medicine, City Avenue.

Soodak, L. C., & Podell, D. M. (1996). Teacher Efficacy: Toward the Understanding of a Multi-faceted construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12 (4), 401-411.

Trentham, L., Silvern, S., & Brogdon, R. (1985). Teacher Efficacy and Teacher Competency Ratings. Psychology in the Schools, 22 (3), 343-352.

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Gareis, C. r. (2004). Principals’ Sense of Efficacy: Assessing a Promising Construct. Journal of Educational Administration, 42 (5), 573-585.

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2007). The Differential Antecedents of Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Novice and Experienced Teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23 (6), 944-956.

Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher Efficacy: Its Meaning and Measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202- 248.

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk-Hoy, A. (2002). The Influence of Resource and Support on Teacher’s Efficacy Beliefs. Paper Presented at the The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

Wolters, C. A., & Daugherty, S. G. (2007). Goal Structures and Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy: Their Relation and Association to Teaching Experience and Academic Level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99 (1), 181.

Woolfolk, A. E., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Prospective Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy and Beliefs About Control. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), 81.

Zaharilah Abdul Kadir, Nirwana Mohd Rashid, & Rosimah Saat. (2012). Efikasi Kendiri Guru Pemulihan Sekolah Rendah Untuk Mendidik Murid Pemulihan. Paper Presented at the Prosiding Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan IPG 2012.

Zuria Mahmud. (2009). Bimbingan dan Mentoran. In Mohd Amin Embi (Ed.), Buku Panduan Amalan Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Berkesan (pp. 247-264). Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.