A New Understanding Towards Reviewing Arabic Language Teaching And Learning

Popoola Kareem Hamed; Koussoube  Issa; Ahmed Fuad  Al Anzarouti

doi:10.33102/uij.vol36no01.542

Authors

Popoola Kareem Hamed Faculty of Education, Al-Madinah International University, Jalan 2/125e, Taman Desa Petaling, 57100 Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3808-0451
Koussoube Issa Faculty of Education, Al-Madinah International University, Jalan 2/125e, Taman Desa Petaling, 57100 Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur
Ahmed Fuad Al Anzarouti Faculty of Education, Al-Madinah International University, Jalan 2/125e, Taman Desa Petaling, 57100 Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33102/uij.vol36no01.542

Keywords:

Curriculum, Language Learning, Pedagogy, Arabic Language

Abstract

This research aims to reveal how to renew Arabic language teaching in the Arab World. The author sheds light on the best methodology to achieve that hope of renewal as it is eminent and the rapid changes in the world of education push towards an inevitable change. This research used a qualitative analytical approach to analyze the efficacy and feebleness of several most influential teaching approaches and methods: Personalized education, Direct Method, Audio-lingual Method, and Communicative Teaching Method, in order to have a better understanding and application in future teaching practice. The results of the study indicated that concentration on the functional usage of language mainly, the practical teaching of grammar and composition to make sure that our learners can be assisted to communicate with members of their communities easily where students can express their needs, effective positive interaction, and their interests and inclinations should be considered in teaching language. The author called strongly that teachers should be trained to personalize their teaching as this would change the teachers’ methodology and teach every student according to his/her abilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bull, S., & Ma, Y. (2001). Raising learner awareness of language learning strategies in situations of limited resources. Interactive Learning Environments, 9, 171-200.

Hary, B. H. (2009). Translating religion: Linguistic analysis of Judeo-Arabic sacred texts from Egypt (Vol. 38). Brill.

Ismayil, M. (2016) Contribution of Arabic Language Academies in Modernizing Arabic Language with Special Focus to the Contribution of Arabic Language Academy of Cairo.

Johnson, G., Kohler, K., & Ross, D. (2017). Contributions of Skinner's theory of verbal behaviour to language interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. Early Child Development and Care, 187(3-4), 436-446.Pierre Clarac- L’enseignement du Francais- press universitaires de France- paris-1969- p280

Little, A. W. (2001). Multigrade teaching: towards an international research and policy agenda. International Journal of Educational Development, 21(6), 481-497.

Mahfouz, Naguib. The Journey of Ibn Fattouma. Anchor, 2016.

Stern, H.H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian: Modern Language Review, 31, 304-318.

Tyacke, M., & Mendelsohn, D. (1986). Student’s needs: Cognitive as well as communicative. TESL Canada journal, 1, 177-198.

Vann, R. & Abraham, R. (1990). Strategies of unsuccessful language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 24(2), 223-234.

Wenden, A. L. (1987). Conceptual background and utility. In A. L. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning, 3-13. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Williams, M. & Burden, R. (1997). Psychology for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Yamamorio, K., Isoda, T., Hiromori, T., & Oxford, R. L. (2003). Using cluster analysis to uncover L2 learner differences in strategy use, will to learn, and achievement over time. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 41, 381-409.

Zreik, Constantine (1980), "W are the Future", Second Edition, Beirut, Dar Al Malayin