Best Practice for the Care and Use of Animals in Experimentation: A Malaysian Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33102/uij.vol30no.202Keywords:
Animal Ethics, Animal Experimentation, Animal Law, Animal Research, Scientific Purposes.Abstract
Passing federal laws and national guidelines is one of the best revenues to protect animals used in experimentation. The laws can establish standards of care for animals in scientific research such as housing standards and treatment for the animals. At international level, animal ethics and law for the care and use of animal in experimentation have been widely discussed for decades ago. There are several well-known international documents and guidelines that have been referred by many countries when constructing their own federal laws governing the subject matter. They are Terrestrial Code, European Directives, and International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research Involving Animals. In Malaysia, the Animal Welfare Act 2015 finally has been enforced on 18th July 2017 where the Act among others will regulate the use of animal for scientific purposes in the country. Besides, it will validate the practice of Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) which was based on self-regulation before the enactment of the Act and the Act is significant of having legal enforcement in order to give better protection to the animals subjected to experimentation. Thus, the law has taken its role in enhancing the animal ethics for the care and use of animal in science in Malaysia. This paper aims to analyses the provisions of law in several international documents governing the subject matter that reflect the international practice. Then it will look into the practice of research institutions in Malaysia, applying the existing animal ethics and law in the subject matter. This paper adopts doctrinal approach considering primary and secondary sources of law. Relevant to this, Animal Welfare Act 2015 (AWA) and Malaysian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes (My Code) are analysed. Besides, it also employed empirical study by way of interviews and observation. This paper is significant to inform the practice of animal ethics at international level to be learned by Malaysia as the country is still at an early stage of having the new Act.
Downloads
References
Animal Welfare Act 2015 (Act 772).
Animal Welfare (Animals Used in Research, Testing or Teaching) Regulations 2015.
Malaysian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Research 2014. Laboratory Animal Science Association of Malaysia (LASAM).
Policy of University Kebangsaan Malaysia Animal Ethics Committee (UKMAEC) Regarding The Use Of Animals In Research.
Universiti Malaya Animal Care And Use Policy.
Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament.
European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes. Council of Europe, European Treaty Series- No.123.
International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research Involving Animals, December 2012. Council for International Organization of Medical Sciences and The International Council for Laboratory Animal Science.
Terrestrial Animal Health Code. 2011. 20th Edition. France: World Organization for Animal Health
Universal Declaration on Animal Welfare.
Ferdowsian, H. R. & Beck, N. 2011. Ethical and Scientific Considerations Regarding Animal Testing and Research. PLOS ONE Online, Vol.6, Issue 9.
Gibson, M. 2011. The Universal Declaration of Animal Welfare. Deakin Law Review, Vol. 16, No. 2, p. 539-567.
Ibrahim, D. M. 2006. Reduce, Refine, Replace: The Failure of the Three R’s and the Future of Animal Experimentation. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 191-225.
Mellor, D. J. 2016. Updating Animal Welfare Thinking: Moving Beyond the “Five Freedoms” Towards “A Life Worth Living”.
Olsson, I. A. S., Silva, S. P. D, Townend, D., & Sandoe, P. 2016. Protecting Animals and Enabling Research in the European Union: An Overview of Development and Implementation of Directive 2010/63/EU. ILAR Journal, Vol. 57, No. 3, p. 347-357.
Retnam, L., Chatikavanij, P., Kunjara, P., Paramastri, Y. A., Goh, Y. M., Hussein, F. N., Mutalib, A. R., & Poosala, S. 2016. Laws, Regulations, Guidelines and Standards for Animal Care and Use for Scientific Purposes in the Countries of Singapore, Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia and India. ILAR Journal, 2016, Vol. 57, No. 3. p. 318-319.
Sharman, K. 2006. Opening the Laboratory Door: National and International Legal Responsibilities for the Use of Animals in Scientific Research- An Australian Perspective. Journal of Animal Law, Vol. 2, No. 1, p. 67-85.
Stojanovic, N. 2016. Which Animal Rights Should Be Recognized. Annals FLB, Belgrade Law Review, No. 3.
Theodorou, Y. 2005. Morality and Animal Experimentation in Medical Research. UCL Jurispudence Review, p. 63-79.
Vasbinder, M. A. & Locke, P. 2016. Introduction: Global Laws, Regulations and Standards for Animal Research. ILAR Journal, Vol. 57, No. 3, p.261-265.
Webster, J. 2016. Animal Welfare: Freedoms, Dominions and “A Life Worth Living.” MDPI Journal, Vol. 6, p. 35-41. Retrieved from www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/6/6/35/pdf
Whittaker, A. 2014. Animal Research Regulation in Australia: Does it Pass the Test of Robustness? http://www.gjal.abo.fi/
Hugo, K. 5 September 2017. The Universal Declaration on Animal Welfare. Thought Co. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/universal-declaration-on-animal-welfare-4150331
International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research Involving Animals. Council for International Organization of Medical Sciences and The International Council for Laboratory Animal Science. December 2012. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/guiding_principles_2012.pdf
Interviews:
Department of Veterinary Service, 17th March 2018
Institute of Medical Research, Kuala Lumpur, 7th March 2018
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Arif Fahmi Md Yusof
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
If the article is accepted for publication, the copyright of this article will be vested to author(s) and granted the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, unless otherwise stated. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.