Analisis Kritis Terhadap Pandangan Sarjana Dalam Mendefinisikan Manhaj, Uslub Dan Wasilah Dakwah

[The Critical Analysis Toward the Views of Scholars in Defining Manhaj, Uslūb And Wasīlah Da’wah]

Authors

  • Siti Jamiaah Abdul Jalil Pusat Kesejahteraan Insan & Komuniti, Fakulti Pengajian Islam, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33102/uij.vol31no.104

Keywords:

Methodology of da’wah, manhaj, uslūb, wasīlah

Abstract

Terdapat tiga istilah yang sering kali disebut oleh para sarjana dalam membincangkan metode dakwah iaitu manhaj, uslub, dan wasilah. Mereka berbeza pandangan dalam mendefinisikan setiap satu terma berkenaan. Ada yang memberikan definisi yang luas dan ada pula yang memberikan definisi yang agak sempit. Ada yang mendefinisikan metode dalam dakwah sebagai manhaj, tetapi ada pula yang mendefinisikannya sebagai uslub. Perbezaan dalam mendefinisikan perkara ini menyebabkan perbezaan terma tetapi pada hakikatnya merujuk kepada aspek yang sama sahaja. Metode kepustakaan digunakan bagi membincangkan perbezaan pandangan berkenaan. Hasil utama perbincangan mendapati metode dakwah terbahagi kepada tiga tingkatan yang mewakili 3 istilah tersebut; pertama, manhaj bagi menentukan tujuan dari sesuatu usaha dakwah, kedua, uslub iaitu pendekatan yang dijalankan, dan ketiga, wasilah iaitu merujuk kepada medium atau saluran yang digunakan.

Abstract

There are three terms that usually used by scholars in discussion on method of da’wah namely, manhaj, uslūb and wasīlah. They have different views in defining each of these terms. Some scholars provide a wide definition while others provide a narrow definition. Some define method as manhaj, but some define the same method as the uslūb. Difference perspective in defining this matter led to the different terms but the essence of the subject is same. Library research method is used to discuss different view among scholars on this matter. The result found that the method of da’wah could be divided into three levels; the first is manhaj to determine the direction of a da’wah that is called manhaj, the approach used that is called uslūb and the medium used is that called wasīlah. The difference among scholars in expressing method da'wah is only in terminology chosen, not in the essence because they agree that da'wah should be done with the appropriate methods and approaches that may differ according to nature of target groups. Different approaches are inevitable because da’wah could be seen from many perspectives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Burghuth, ‘Abd al-‘Azīz. 2005. Manahij al-Da’wah fi al-Mujtama’ al-Muta’addid al-Adyan wa al-Ajnas. Kuala Lumpur: IIUM.
‘Abd al-Karīm Zaydan. 1996. Usul al-da’wah. Beirut: Muassat al-Risalah.
Ab. Aziz Mohd Zin. 2001. Metodologi Dakwah. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.
Abu Faris, Muhammad Abdul Qadir. 1992. Usūs al-Da’wah wa Wasail Nashriha. Jordan: Darul Furqan.
Ahmad Ghalwasy. 1978. al-Da`wah al-Islamiyah: Usuluha wa-Wasa'iluha. al-Qāhirah: Dār al-Kitāb al-Misrī,.
Al-‘Ammar, Hamd bin Nasir. 1998. Asalib al-da’wah al-Islamiyyah al-mu’asarah. Al-Riyad: Markaz al-Dirāsat wa al-I’lam.
Muhammad al-Bayanūni. 1999. Madkhal Ila Ilmi al-Da‘wah. Beirut: Muassasat al-Risalah.
Al-Butiy, Muhammad Sa‘id Ramadhān. 1981. Hakaza, Falnad’u ila al-Islam. Beirut: Muassat al-Risalah.
Alī ‘Abd al-Halim Mahmud. 1990. Wasail al-Tarbiyyah ‘ind al-Ikhwan al-Muslimin. 3th ed. Al-Mansurah: Dār al-Wafa’.
Al-Mahalliy, Jalal al-Din Muhammad ibn Ahmad & Al-Suyūtiy, Abd Rahman ibn Abi Bakr. t.t. Tafsir al-Jalalayn. al-Qahirah: Maktabah al-Qahirah.
Al-Mu’jam al-Wasit . 1985. al-Qahirah: Majma’ al-Lughah al-‘Arabiyyah.
Al-Quran Tajwid Dan Terjemahan. 2014. Semenyih: Humaira Publications.
Al-Qurtubi, Abu ‘Abd Allah Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Ansari. 1967. al-Jami’li-Ahkam al-Qur’an. Jil. 6. al-Qahirah: Wizarat At-Thaqafah.
Al-Sayyid Nawfal Abd Al-Majd. 1977. Al-Da’wah Ila Allah Taala: Khasa’isuha Muqawwimatuha wa Manahijuha. Kaherah: Maktabah al-Hadrah al-Qawmiyyah al-Fujalah.
Al-Tantawiy. 1960. ‘Alī, Fusūl Islamiyyah. Damsyik: Dār al-Da’wah.
Fathi Yakan. 1970. Kayfa Nad’u ila Allah. Beirut: Muassat al-Risalah.
Fathi Yakan. 1980. Mushkilat al-Da‘wah wa al-Da‘iyah. Beirut: Mu’assasat al-Risalah.
Hassan al-Banna. 1992. Majmu’at Rasail al-Imām al-Shahid Hasan al-Banna, al-Qahirah: Dār al-Tauzi’ wa al-Nashr al-Islamiyyah.
Ibn Manzur, Muhammad ibn Mukarram. 1990. Lisan al-‘Arab. Vol 1, 2 & 11. Bayrut: Dar Sadir.
Ibrahim Hj. Che Noh. 2001. Metodologi Dakwah. Monograf, Jabatan Pengajian Dakwah dan Kepimpinan, Fakulti Pengajian Islam, UKM. Bangi: Penerbit UKM.
Jarishah, Ali. 1986. Manhaj Al-Da’wah Wa Asalibuha. Al-Mansurah: Darul Wafa.
Hawkins, J. M. 2008. Kamus Dwibahasa Oxford Fajar. Shah Alam: Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd.
Kamus Dewan, ed. Ke-4. 2005. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka.
Mustafa Masyhur. 1995. Min Fiqh al-Da’wah. Bayrut: Dār al-Tauzi’ wa al-Nashr al-Islamiyyah.
Samih ‘Atif al-Zayn. 1975. Sifat al-Da’iah Wa Kayfiyyan Haml al-Da’wah. Lebanon: Dar al-Kutub al-Lubnani.
Shalabiyy, Abd Ra’uf. 1974. Manahijuha wa Ghayatuha al-Da’wah al-Islamiyyah fī ‘Ahdiha al-Makkiy. al-Qahirah: Majma’ al-Buhuth al-Islamiyyah.
Siti Rugayah Haji Tibek. 1999. Peranan Drama dalam Dakwah: Kajian Drama Dakwah TV 1 dan TV 3. Tesis Doktor Falsafah, Akademi Pengajian Islam, Universiti Malaya.
Sulaiman bin Ibrahim. 2005. Manhaj Dakwah Al-Syaikh Ibn Atha’illah Al-Sakandariy dan Pengaruhnya di Malaysia. Disertasi, Akademi Pengajian Islam, Universiti Malaya.
Syed Abdurahman bin Syed Hussin. 1996. “Uslub Al-Hikmah, Al-Mawcizah al-Hasanah and Mujadalah bi al-Husna through the Eyes of the Muslim Scholars”, Journal of Usuluddin 4 : 49-70.
Wan Hussein Azmi. 1984. Ilmu Dakwah,Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Downloads

Published

2020-08-02

How to Cite

Abdul Jalil, S. J. (2020). Analisis Kritis Terhadap Pandangan Sarjana Dalam Mendefinisikan Manhaj, Uslub Dan Wasilah Dakwah: [The Critical Analysis Toward the Views of Scholars in Defining Manhaj, Uslūb And Wasīlah Da’wah]. Ulum Islamiyyah, 31, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.33102/uij.vol31no.104